Pursivic field notes / Public sample 002
A public-source pursuit brief
Documents reviewed 2026-09-05 · Healthcare · Fort Worth, Texas
The decision to investigate
Taken together, timing, scale, and service needs justify a focused review. The request supplies context; it does not close the approval gate. Establish the current procurement position, then assess whether your firm has a credible delivery role.
Interpretation, not an agency recommendation. No win probability, confirmed budget, or partner commitment is inferred.
Documented: GSA lists November 10, 2030 as the existing lease expiration, and proposes a replacement lease for up to 20 years.
AEC interpretation: Work backward from occupancy needs to assess delivery timing.
Still unknown: Current procurement milestones, amendments, and any interim lease actions remain unverified in this sample.
GSA lease prospectus PTX-02-VA26 · Page 1 ↗Documented: The prospectus proposes 177,230 net usable square feet and 1,095 parking spaces.
AEC interpretation: Test site, healthcare planning, engineering, and delivery fit.
Still unknown: Final requirements, site selection, delivery partners, and contractual scope need current procurement evidence.
GSA lease prospectus PTX-02-VA26 · Page 1 ↗Documented: VA’s FY 2026 submission lists an $85,679,000 committee resolution request and $11,375,000 in unserviced annual rent for Fort Worth.
AEC interpretation: Use the request as planning context, not a construction award value or an available budget.
Still unknown: This document alone does not establish current committee approvals, appropriations, a lease award, or an open response window.
VA FY 2026 budget submission, Volume 4 · Printed page 4-13 ↗Documented: GSA describes projected growth in ambulatory and mental-health workload over 20 years, with flexibility as care needs change.
AEC interpretation: Evaluate adaptable clinical planning and continuity of care.
Still unknown: A quantified catchment forecast and a current facility-condition assessment were not verified for this sample.
GSA lease prospectus PTX-02-VA26 · Page 2 ↗A healthcare planning lead, engineering team, and lease/development delivery capability are roles to evaluate. These are suggested checks, not a named or confirmed team.
Introduction path: not established in this public sample. A listed firm or public contact is not evidence of a relationship. Confirm relevant projects, capacity, and permission before seeking an introduction.
Private workspace notes, contact details, and relationship history are not part of this public example.
Suggested accountable roles, not assigned people. Your team sets the review date and effort limit.
BD lead
Locate the official notice, amendments, response window, and authorized engagement channel. Reconcile them with these planning documents.
Healthcare technical lead
Review requirements, relevant completed work, occupied-facility experience, and staffing availability. Record any gaps.
Pursuit sponsor
Confirm approvals and commercial fit, then approve a bounded discovery effort or stop. No spending authorization is implied by this sample.
FY 2026 prospectus · pages 1–3 · Reviewed 2026-09-05
https://origin-www.gsa.gov/system/files/PTX-02-VA26%2C%20Fort%20Worth%2C%20TX%20-%20Prospectus%20508%205-22-26.pdfMay 2025 · printed page 4-13 (PDF page 71) · Reviewed 2026-09-05
https://department.va.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/FY26-Volume-4-Construction-and-Long-Range-Capital-Plan.pdf#page=71The review date records when these documents were checked, not when the underlying project status last changed. The source register is limited to the two documents above.
Explore a fictional four-signal example and rehearse the tradeoffs, or ask us to walk through your firm’s pursuit workflow.